Frequently Asked Questions

FAQ Topics
FAQ Topics

Yes. Corruption is a phenomenon that involves both public organizations and private entities. EACC intervenes only in cases where public funds or public interest is at stake. In cases where only private interest is at stake, the parties are normally advised to refer the matter to the Police for investigation under the penal code or for adjudication as civil matters in courts of law. Bribery Act 2016 empowers EACC to investigate bribery in private sector.

Is there any remedy for a person who is dissatisfied with services of EACC?Yes. Anybody dissatisfied with the Commission’s services can seek redress by raising the issue with the Chairperson of EACC or by filing a complaint in court of law if a matter merits such action. The Justice and Legal Affairs Committee of Parliament is yet another avenue through which a remedy could be sought. In specific circumstances, remedy could be sought from other government oversight bodies such as Commission on Administrative Justice, Public Procurement Oversight Authority and Office of the Auditor General.

EACC is enhancing its national presence by opening more regional offices in order to monitor corruption at County levels in addition to the implementation of proactive county advisories focusing on strong systems and prudent use of public resources. EACC is also conducting public education and awareness programmes to enable ordinary Kenyans to proactively participate and oversight governance at County levels. A number of corruption reports from the Counties and other government oversight bodies are also under active investigations.

EACC is developing a baseline survey on the levels of corruption in the county governments to inform its interventions. With the transfer of resources to the Counties, there is a danger of corruption and unethical conduct taking root in those governments. Already there are reports by various government agencies, the media, civil society, and ordinary citizens which indicate misappropriation and imprudent use of resources within County governments.

EACC has continued to experience challenges in the form of limited finances and staff capacity, gaps in existing legal framework, a culture in Kenya that tolerates corruption, inadequate public participation in governance processes, weak accountability systems, a slow judicial process and inadequate coordination between justice sector agencies just to mention a few.

EACC works with other institutions to combat and prevent corruption through a number of strategies. These include:  training and sensitization of staff, development of anti-corruption tools such as policies and codes of conduct, systems reviews, advisories, establishment of Corruption Prevention Committees, Integrity Testing Programmes and investigation of corruption and ethical breaches.

Yes. EACC is a Constitutional Commission that draws its budget from the exchequer. As such EACC is subject to the normal Government of Kenya audit requirements by the Office of the Auditor General.

Yes. The Constitution obligates the Commission to enforce the provisions of Chapter Six on Leadership and Integrity. This Chapter requires persons seeking public office to be selected on the basis of personal integrity, competence and suitability. To determine this threshold, the Commission is mandated to inquire into the conduct of such persons and make recommendations to the interested institutions. In this regard, members of the public are encouraged to provide information touching on the integrity of such persons to the Commission or any other body considering them for appointment or election to public office.

The law provides that a gift or donation given to a State or Public Officer on a public or official occasion is a gift or donation to the State and shall be surrendered to the State. However, the law provides exemptions when a State or a Public Officer may receive and retain a gift. These include:  a gift given in ordinary bounds of courtesy and protocol, a gift of a non- monetary nature not exceeding the value prescribed by EACC and a gift from a relative or friend on an occasion recognized by custom.

The law expressly prohibits any gifts or hospitality given with the intention of compromising the integrity, objectivity or impartiality of the State or Pubic Officer. Some gifts such as jewellery, precious metal or stones, ivory or other animal part categorized as prohibited by law. The law obligates each public entity to maintain a register of gifts received and those given to other organizations.

Yes. The Commission receives many reports from members of the public. However, not all the reports fall within its mandate. All reports that disclose corruption, economic crime or unethical conduct are taken up for investigation or other administrative action by the Commission. EACC forwards any reports that fall outside its mandate to the appropriate bodies for relevant action.

Report all forms of corruption to EACC or other law enforcement agencies. You could report corruption by:

  1. Letter to the Secretary/CEO, EACC P.O. Box 61130-00200, Nairobi
  2. Telephone 0729 888881/2/3 (General), 020-2717468 (Hotline)
  3. Fax 020-2719757
  4. Email: report@integrity.go.ke
  5. Social media: facebook.com/EACC; twitter.com/EACC
  6. Use of drop-in corruption reporting boxes available at EACC and other public offices
  7. Use of the BKMS Anonymous Reporting System available at EACC website (eacc.go.ke)
  8. Use Integrated Public Complaints Referral Mechanism (IPCRM) available at the offices of EACC, Commission on Administrative Justice (CAJ), Transparency International (TI-Kenya), Kenya National Commission on Human Rights, National Anti-Corruption Campaign Steering Committee and National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC).
  9. Visiting EACC’s offices in person
  10. Visiting EACC desk at the Huduma Centres
  11. Any other convenient method such as the mainstream media, etc.

Corruption affects everyone in society. Therefore fighting corruption and promoting integrity and ethical behaviour is a civic responsibility of every citizen.  Join in the fight against corruption by;

  1. Obeying all laws, rules and regulations
  2. Naming and shaming the corrupt
  3. Instilling ethics and positive values in the upbringing of children
  4. Being a positive role model
  5. Electing leaders of integrity
  6. Questioning leaders on how they manage public resources
  7. Supporting anti corruption initiatives
  8. Sensitizing others on the dangers of corruption
  9. Refusing to give or take  bribes
  10. Whistle blowing and reporting corruption

EACC was established by law in September 2011 to succeed the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission (KACC) which had been in operation since 2004. The following are some of the major achievements made in its anti – corruption efforts:

  1. Law enforcement
    Over the past 10 years, EACC has carried out numerous investigations resulting in recoveries worth KES 9.186 billion out of traced assets whose value was KES 37.779 billion. Recovery proceedings for the remaining assets are ongoing. Further, the Commission conducted proactive investigations leading to disruption of corruption in respect of public assets valued at approximately KES 73.605 billion.Similarly, the Commission conducted investigations on corruption and economic crimes and made recommendations to the ODPP which resulted into various prosecutions. Out of the various prosecutions, 140 convictions were achieved involving 171 convicts.For more details on the Commission’s achievements see its Annual Reports at www.eacc.go.ke
  2. Preventive Programmes
    In the past 10 years, EACC has reached 16, 047, 577 people with anti-corruption, ethics, integrity and good governance messages aimed at  enlisting their support in the fight against corruption. This has been achieved through media, workshops, symposia, outreach clinics and other training activities. In the same period, EACC has conducted 61 systems reviews and advisories mostly in the public sector which were aimed at reforming governance, strengthening systems and improving service delivery.
  3. Research Programmes
    Over the past 10 years EACC has conducted thirty (30) research programmes which include surveys, assessments and sector studies. These programmes provided baseline information on corruption in order to better understand the nature, form, extent, intensity, impact, and the places where it occurs.  In recent years, the surveys have ranked counties on the basis of levels of perceived corruption with the view to helping them improve on governance and service delivery.

There is no one sure approach to eliminating or reducing corruption. This is because corruption is a dynamic social problem which shows itself in many ways. A sustained approach that employs different means is therefore the only way out. Such an approach must combine law enforcement, strengthening institutions, promoting good governance, and conducting public education. EACC has adopted these approaches in the fight against corruption in Kenya.

Certain corruption cases are complex in nature hence take too long to investigate especially where they involve international dimensions. Many accused persons, especially those involved in high profile cases of corruption, resort to various legal mechanisms such as judicial review and constitutional petitions which delays the conclusion of cases. Speedy conclusion of corruption cases is constrained by the constitutional safeguards and guarantees that the law gives to due process and the rights of the accused. This is also compounded by capacity constraints in the institutions charged with investigation, prosecution and adjudication of such cases.

No, it is not true.  The Commission does not discriminate on any reported case of corruption whether ‘petty’ or ‘grand’. The Commission believes that all kinds of corruption are bad for our society. This position is reflected in the range of cases that the Commission has investigated and forwarded to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, which include numerous high profile cases involving State and Public Officers.

Yes. It is an offence under the Public Officer Ethics Act for any public officer not to fully or correctly disclose all incomes, assets and liabilities. Any person who commits this offence is liable to a fine of Ksh.1, 000,000/- or imprisonment for one year or both.

Public Officers are the custodians of public resources. Therefore there is need for them to declare their wealth so as to determine whether their legitimately known sources of income match their assets and liabilities. Wealth declaration is a well known tool in the fight against corruption.

Yes. The Public Officer Ethics Act requires Public Officers to make true and correct declarations of their incomes, assets and liabilities once every two years. All State Officers are Public Officers but not all Public Officers are State Officers. All Public Officers must also declare all incomes, assets and liabilities of their spouse(s) and children below eighteen (18) years of age. Under Article 260 of the Constitution, a Public Officer refers to any State Officer or any other person holding a public office.

Any person found guilty of corruption offences or economic crimes shall be liable to:

  1. A fine not exceeding KES 1,000,000/- or imprisonment for a period not exceeding ten years or both.
  2. An additional mandatory fine, if as a result of the corrupt conduct or economic crime, the person received a benefit that can be quantified or measured or any person has suffered a loss that can be quantified or measured.
  3. The mandatory fine shall be equal to two times the amount of the benefit or loss described above, or to two times the amount of the benefit and loss described above where the corrupt conduct or economic crime results in both a benefit and a loss.
  4. A person who engages in corruption or economic crimes is also personally liable to compensate anyone who suffers a loss as a result of the corrupt conduct.

In addition,

  1. A public officer who is charged with corruption or economic crime is suspended at half pay with effect from the date of the charge.
  2. If convicted, the officer is suspended without pay pending the outcome of any appeal.
  3. If the appeal is upheld or the period for lodging an appeal lapses, the officer is dismissed from service.
  4. Upon dismissal from service, the officer is further disqualified from holding any public office for a period of ten years.

Not found what you were looking for?

Write to us or call us on our toll free number

Search our site

No Search Query Added